01 / Overview
What reduces the risk
The timing of a transaction matters. In a bankruptcy case, the debtor's transactions are examined over periods that the law counts back from the court's acceptance of the petition to declare the debtor bankrupt: the closer a transaction is to that point, the wider the range of grounds on which it is examined. The assessment begins by determining which actions involving assets and liabilities are still possible in the current position.
A transaction is assessed by its substance. A transaction may be declared invalid if the other party provided inadequate consideration, including where the price or other terms are significantly worse for the debtor than those on which similar transactions are made in comparable circumstances. A flawlessly documented transaction without a genuine basis does not improve the company's position.
A purpose of causing harm is presumed, in particular, if the transaction was made without consideration or with an interested party at a time when the debtor already met the criterion of inability to pay or insufficiency of assets. A transaction made merely for appearance's sake is void.
Some of the risks concern the company's executives and participants. A person controlling the debtor may be held subsidiarily liable if creditors' claims cannot be paid in full as a result of that person's actions or omissions, in particular owing to transactions that caused significant harm to creditors or to missing or distorted accounting records.
A further ground relates to failure to file a debtor's petition. The law obliges the chief executive to file a debtor's petition when the circumstances specified in the law arise.