Expertise/Insolvency

Service

Debt Restructuring and Settlement Agreements

The debtor and its creditors agree out of court on deferral, instalments or other terms for repaying the debt. A settlement agreement is approved by the court and ends a court dispute or a bankruptcy case on the agreed terms.

We are most often instructed by:

  • Debtors proposing new payment terms to creditors
  • Creditors that have received a debt restructuring proposal
  • Parties to a court dispute entering into a settlement agreement
  • Group companies securing each other's obligations

The information on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute a public offer.

What the Service Includes

Timing and Fees
–timing on request
from ₽fee on request

Timing and fees are indicative and are confirmed when the engagement is agreed.

01 / Overview
What determines the outcome

A creditor compares the proposal with the alternative. The alternative is litigation and participation in a bankruptcy case, the outcome of which depends on the composition of the debtor's assets, the availability of security, the ranking of claims and the timing of payments. A debt restructuring proposal is prepared with a calculation showing this comparison: without it, the proposal reads as a request for deferral.

The composition of creditors determines the structure of the arrangements. A secured creditor, a supplier that continues to work with the debtor and a purchaser of a claim have different interests. The terms for different creditors may differ but must be comparable in economic outcome; the order in which each of them is approached also matters.

The feasibility of the schedule matters more than its length. An agreement whose terms exceed the debtor's capacity leads to a further default and to the consequences provided for by law and by the agreement. The schedule is matched against cash flow and the seasonality of the business, and the document includes terms for deviations from the plan.

The law provides for several mechanisms: payment by instalments and deferral of payment, set-off of a counterclaim, replacement of the original obligation with another, transfer of debt, and release of the debtor from its obligation in whole or in part. For companies, there is no separate insolvency procedure called “debt restructuring”: in a bankruptcy case, one of the means of changing payment terms is a settlement agreement.

A settlement agreement in a court case can be concluded at any stage, including during enforcement of the court ruling.

The course of negotiations may later be examined in court. Correspondence, proposals and admissions of particular facts are used in court cases and in bankruptcy cases, including when the debtor's transactions are reviewed and the management's actions are assessed: documents are prepared with their possible use in a dispute in mind.

02 / Categories
Categories of cases
  • Changing terms before litigationObligations for which no claims have been filed in court: payment schedule, changes to the price and scope of obligations, replacement and addition of security, set-off of counterclaims.
  • Settlement during litigationA settlement agreement with terms on the allocation of court costs and the waiver of part of the claims.
  • Settlement agreement in a bankruptcy caseAgreeing it at the meeting of creditors and submitting the agreement to the court for approval.
  • Obligations of a group of companiesChanges to terms affect several entities, intra-group obligations and mutual security, and require the sequence of documents to be coordinated.
  • Acting for creditorsAnalysis of the proposal received, checking the feasibility of the schedule and the adequacy of the security.
  • Secured obligationsChanges to terms affect pledges, suretyships and independent guarantees; terms are agreed taking into account the position of the security providers.
03 / Outcome
Service Outcome
  • Written assessmentThe grounds of the debt, the parties' positions and a comparison of the available options.
  • Calculation for negotiationsPayment amounts and dates, with justification of the schedule's feasibility.
  • Draft agreementsThe parties' arrangements in documented form.
  • Court materialsThe text of the settlement agreement and the annexes to the application for its approval.
  • Participation in hearingsPresenting arguments in support of the materials submitted.
  • Next stepsAction in the event of deviation from the payment schedule or loss of security.

The outcome of the service is the work performed within the scope agreed with the client.

04 / Preparation
What the position is built on
  1. Materials

    The position is built on the documents and the circumstances of the case; the following points are relevant.

    • Contracts and primary documentsContracts, reconciliation statements, payment orders, calculation of accrued sanctions.
    • SecurityPledges, suretyships, guarantees and information on the security providers.
    • Source of repaymentInformation on receipts and planned payments for calculating the schedule.
    • Composition of creditorsA list of claims, information on claims filed in court and on acquired claims.
    • Corporate documentsThe charter and resolutions of management bodies required to conclude the agreements.
    • Case materialsCourt rulings, if a dispute is already being heard or a bankruptcy case has been opened.
    • Purpose of the requestRevising payment terms, analysing a proposal received or ending a dispute amicably.
  2. Assessment

    On the basis of the materials, the strengths and weaknesses of the position, the risks and the possible courses of action are identified.

  3. Plan

    For the chosen option, a plan is drawn up: the sequence of steps, timing and scope of work.

05 / Projects
Selected Projects
01 / 04

Subsidiary Liability

Reversal of a subsidiary liability finding in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Challenge

The insolvency administrator and creditors sought to hold the chief executive of the bankrupt company personally liable for its debts. The lower courts granted the claims.

What was done

The case was taken to the Supreme Court, the good faith of each management decision was proven, and the Supreme Court set aside those court rulings. The amount of liability avoided is comparable to the total amount of creditors' claims in the register.

Acting for the creditor

Inclusion of an affiliated creditor's claims in the register: five related bankruptcies

Challenge

Five parallel bankruptcy cases were under way within a group of companies. The client was a creditor affiliated with the debtor, and the courts applied subordination: its claims were lowered in ranking.

What was done

A legal position was developed demonstrating that there were no grounds for subordination. The court rulings were set aside, and the claims were included in the register in full, on an equal footing with independent creditors, in all five cases.

Returning assets to the bankruptcy estate

Recovery of assets diverted on the eve of insolvency

Challenge

The debtor had diverted its assets through a chain of formally independent transactions, each of which appeared to be an ordinary commercial operation.

What was done

The full chain was reconstructed, and the interconnection and invalidity of each link were proven. The assets were returned to the bankruptcy estate in full, and the creditors obtained a real source of repayment.

Asset Protection

Protecting a client's assets in a third party's insolvency

Challenge

An attempt was made, by challenging transactions, to include the client's property – acquired, paid for and in commercial use – in the bankruptcy estate of an insolvent counterparty.

What was done

A legal position was built confirming the independent nature of the client's title. The court dismissed all the challenges, and the assets were preserved in full, without concessions or settlement agreements.

06 / Questions
Frequently Asked Questions

Work begins with an analysis of the debt and the parties' positions: the composition of and grounds for the claims, payments, security and court cases.

Following this analysis, options for changing payment terms and the consequences of each are discussed. If several parties to the same debt need assistance, a conflict of interest check is carried out before work begins.

A calculation showing that the proposed option is better for the creditor than the alternative, and evidence that the schedule is feasible.

The source of repayment, the existence and composition of security, the transparency of information on the debtor's condition and terms allowing performance to be monitored all matter.

The consequences depend on the composition of the remaining claims: an application to court or a bankruptcy petition by any creditor affects the performance of the arrangements already reached.

The persons whose participation is needed to preserve the arrangements, and the order in which they are approached, are determined. In some cases terms are agreed with all of them simultaneously.

The difference lies in how they are concluded and in their consequences: a settlement agreement is approved by the court within a case and leads to the termination of the proceedings, whereas a debt restructuring agreement changes the terms of obligations out of court.

The content requirements and approval procedure also differ: in a bankruptcy case, the agreement is adopted by the meeting of creditors and approved by the court only after first- and second-ranking claims have been paid. The appropriate structure is determined after analysing the situation.

On the creditors' side, the decision is taken by the meeting of creditors and, on the debtor's side, depending on the stage of the case, by its chief executive or by the external administrator or insolvency administrator. The meeting's decision is taken by a majority of votes and is deemed adopted if all creditors whose claims are secured by a pledge of the debtor's property voted in favour; the terms for those who voted against or did not vote cannot be worse than for creditors of the same rank who voted in favour. Third parties assuming rights and obligations under the agreement may participate.

The applicability of this option in the particular case and the conditions under which it is achievable are assessed: preparation includes not only the text of the agreement but also the work before the matter is put to the meeting.

The consequences are determined by the agreement itself: deadlines, sanctions, security and the creditor's right to revert to its original claims. A settlement agreement that is not performed voluntarily is subject to compulsory enforcement on the basis of a writ of execution issued by the court on the application of a party to the agreement.

It does, in two ways. An agreed change of terms that is being performed reduces the likelihood of a bankruptcy case being opened.

At the same time, terms affecting security and payments to individual creditors are later examined in the bankruptcy case: such terms are prepared with that examination in mind.

An hourly rate, a fixed fee or a combined model is used; in some cases part of the fee depends on the outcome achieved. The fee is determined by the time actually spent, the complexity of the matter and the overall timeframe of the project, and is agreed before work begins.

Request a free consultation

Describe your matter and the circumstances in which it arose. The consultation establishes the possible structure of the work and the scope of legal support required.

Email us

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Request sent

We will contact you within 24 hours