Expertise/Litigation

Service

Representation in Commercial (Arbitrazh) Courts and Courts of General Jurisdiction

In the commercial courts, companies are represented in contractual and corporate disputes and in disputes with public authorities. The courts of general jurisdiction hear cases involving individuals that affect a business.

We are most often instructed by:

  • Companies acting as claimants or defendants
  • Participants and shareholders of companies
  • Executives in disputes with the company and its participants
  • Applicants in cases against public authorities
  • Business owners in cases involving individuals
  • Parties that have changed their representative at the appeal stage

The information on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute a public offer.

What the Service Includes

Timing and Fees
–timing on request
from ₽fee on request

Timing and fees are indicative and are confirmed when the engagement is agreed.

01 / Overview
What determines the outcome

The outcome of a case is largely determined by documents drawn up before it began. Contracts, acceptance certificates, correspondence, calculations and the parties' internal documents form the body of evidence, and its content limits the range of possible claims and objections. Work in court relies on an analysis of these documents: they are used to formulate the claims and to determine which facts will have to be proved.

Obtaining a judgment does not in itself mean that it will be enforced. During the proceedings, the debtor may change the composition of its assets and its ownership structure: interim measures, the state of the debtor's assets and the enforcement procedure are considered from the start of the case.

The applicable procedural rules depend on the category of case and the court: the Arbitrazh Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Administrative Court Procedure or the Code of Administrative Offences. A single conflict may involve organizations, their participants and individuals, in which case proceedings may be heard in different courts in parallel. The positions in these cases are aligned: findings in one case are used in another.

02 / Categories
Categories of cases
  • Contractual disputesDisputes over the quality and scope of performance, set-off of claims, termination of a contract and return of what was received, and claims for inaccurate representations.
  • Disputes between participants and the companyChallenges to resolutions of management bodies and to transactions, disputes over title to participatory interests and shares, claims against the company's executives, and expulsion of a participant. The body of evidence is built from the company's documents and the history of its management.
  • Disputes with public authoritiesChallenges to decisions, actions and orders, and cases concerning administrative liability. Time limits for going to court depend on the category of case and may be short: the prospects are assessed immediately after the decision is received. The authority that made the challenged decision must prove its lawfulness; the applicant must prove that its rights have been infringed.
  • Disputes in insolvency proceedingsInclusion of claims in the register and objections to other creditors' claims. The position is aligned with the overall strategy for participating in the case; work for creditors is carried out under the “Creditor Protection” service, and for debtors under the “Debtor Insolvency” service.
  • Cases in courts of general jurisdictionDisputes involving individuals that the law assigns to the jurisdiction of the courts of general jurisdiction, including claims against sureties, disputes over spouses' property affecting business assets, and protection of business reputation outside the sphere of entrepreneurial and other economic activity.
03 / Outcome
Service Outcome
  • Opinion on prospectsA written assessment of the position with possible courses of action and the costs of each.
  • Settlement materialsA letter of claim or a reply to one, and a position for pre-trial negotiations.
  • Procedural documentsStatements of claim, responses, motions, questions for the expert, and appeals and cassation appeals.
  • Attendance at hearingsRepresentation in the courts of first instance, appeal and cassation.
  • Enforcement materialsAn application for a writ of execution and documents for presenting it for enforcement.

The outcome of the service is the work performed within the scope agreed with the client.

04 / Preparation
What the position is built on
  1. Materials

    The position is built on the documents and the circumstances of the case; the following points are relevant.

    • Dispute documentsThe contract, acceptance certificates, correspondence, calculations and other documents on which the claims or objections are based.
    • Case documentsThe demand received, the statement of claim, the court's procedural rulings and documents filed, if proceedings are already under way.
    • PartiesThe parties to the dispute, organizations and persons connected with them, and other cases involving them.
    • Client's objectiveWhat outcome is acceptable, and whether negotiations are possible and on what terms.
    • Upcoming datesReceipt of documents, scheduled hearings and known procedural deadlines.
    • Debtor's assetsKnown accounts, assets and counterparties, where recovery is sought.
  2. Assessment

    On the basis of the materials, the strengths and weaknesses of the position, the risks and the possible courses of action are identified.

  3. Plan

    For the chosen option, a plan is drawn up: the sequence of steps, timing and scope of work.

05 / Projects
Selected Projects
01 / 05

Appeals against court rulings

Dispute over a director's personal liability: rulings set aside by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Challenge

The lower courts granted the claims of the insolvency administrator and the creditors to hold the director of a bankrupt company personally liable for its debts.

What was done

The case was taken to the Supreme Court. The good faith of each management decision was proved, and the Supreme Court set aside the rulings of the lower courts.

Challenging Transactions

Invalidation of a chain of transactions used to divert a debtor's assets

Challenge

Shortly before its insolvency, the debtor diverted its assets through a chain of formally independent transactions, each of which looked like an ordinary business operation.

What was done

The full chain was reconstructed, and the interconnection of the transactions and the invalidity of each link were proved. The assets were returned to the bankruptcy estate in full.

Recovery of Damages

Full recovery of damages from a former general director

Challenge

The former director caused losses to the company, expecting that it would not be possible to gather evidence: numerous transactions, a branching structure and blurred chains of cause and effect.

What was done

A systematic analysis was carried out: the chronology of decisions was reconstructed, the link between the transactions and the damage was identified, and bad faith was proved. The damages were recovered in full; the court granted the claims without any reduction.

Defence against challenges

Protecting the client's ownership against challenges to transactions in a bankruptcy case

Challenge

There were attempts, by challenging transactions, to bring the client's property – acquired, paid for and in commercial use – into the bankruptcy estate of an insolvent counterparty.

What was done

The legal position was built on the independent nature of the client's ownership. The court dismissed all the claims challenging the transactions, and the assets were retained in full without concessions or settlement agreements.

Challenging resolutions

Challenge to general meeting resolutions that blocked the distribution of profits

Challenge

The majority participant systematically blocked the distribution of profits by voting at the general meeting. The company was generating income, but the minority participant did not receive its share of the profits.

What was done

The general meeting resolutions were challenged. A mechanism compelling the distribution of profits was implemented through the courts.

06 / Questions
Frequently Asked Questions

The choice depends on the evidence, the value of the claims, the cost of the proceedings, the other party's solvency, the importance of the relationship with it and the cost of waiting.

In some cases, a settlement produces a result more quickly and at lower cost; in others, the other party uses negotiations to prepare its own position. These factors are weighed when assessing the prospects; it is also possible to move to a settlement when the case is already being heard.

Procedural law provides for interim measures aimed at preserving property and the position of the parties until the dispute is resolved; the commercial court may grant them even before a claim is filed.

It is assessed which measures correspond to the subject matter of the claims and which circumstances show that they are needed. The decision on the measures is taken by the court.

A case can be taken over at any stage, including appeal and cassation. The case file and the procedural steps already taken are examined: at later stages the options are limited; in particular, additional evidence is admitted on appeal if it could not have been submitted at first instance for reasons beyond the party's control.

On that basis, the arguments that still have prospects are assessed, and the arrangements for further work are discussed.

An hourly rate, a fixed fee or a combined model is used; in some cases part of the fee depends on the outcome achieved. The fee is determined by the time actually spent, the complexity of the matter and the overall timeframe of the project, and is agreed before work begins.

Request a free consultation

Describe your matter and the circumstances in which it arose. The consultation establishes the possible structure of the work and the scope of legal support required.

Email us

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Request sent

We will contact you within 24 hours